Upon V-TOB's (Volunteer Teachers of Bhutan) invitation to participate in a discussion on "Quality Teachers for Quality Learning" on 6th February 2021, I spoke on "Teachers Pedagogical Practices in Bhutan" drawing on my experience as a teacher. I watched the recorded video and the following is a verbatim transcription of my talk on the subject.
1. Introduction
Kuzu Zangpola everyone. I am Tshewang Rabgay and I am a PhD student in Education at Monash University in Australia la. Firstly, I would like to thank sir Sonam for having me this evening on V-TOB’s Edutalk. Secondly, it is an honour to be sharing the panel with Sir KC Jose who is a renowned teacher and had a long teaching career in Bhutan and with Sir Tshedrup Dorji, the founder of YAN Bhutan la.
2. Body
Well! The theme for today’s Edutalk is quality teacher for quality learning, a very important subject but it is a broad area to talk about in ten minutes, so I needed to narrow it down la. I looked at some frameworks around teacher quality and found that there are several components that make a great teacher.
I decided to focus on one component instead of going all over. So I will talk on a single component of teacher quality la. I have chosen teaching practices or teachers’ pedagogical practices. And I will be talking on this subject by drawing on some studies and my experience la. I think I have quite a lot to share in ten minutes and I will try to be as fast as possible.
Well, this is a subject which most of us are familiar with
because it has been an area of focus in many public and academic discourses for
quite a while and I might sound a bit cliché today and may have nothing much to
offer but I will just share my ideas la. But it is a subject that has
persistently remained stagnant or had a very slow progress in practice la. Even in an earlier Edutalk I remember Dr. Adrian mentioning “pedagogical
poverty”, hence, I believe that it still needs further discussion and debate
and more so in the context of current education reform la.
Well! It is common knowledge that teachers’ pedagogical practices determine the quality of teaching and learning. However, the narrative that all of us familiar around teachers’ pedagogical practice in Bhutan is that there is a need for a shift from the predominant teacher-centered teaching to more child-centered or constructivist-based teaching to raise the quality of education. I gathered some studies on this area and I found that there is a large body of literature suggesting the need for a shift la.
Then there has also been efforts from the MoE and the
teacher education colleges to educate both in-service and pre-service on
child-centered teaching techniques. The prominent one is the introduction of CL
method in 2016 through the Transformative Pedagogy program. And there are
others such as placed based education, etc. And the Government puts a lot of
financial investment, for example, I got this statistics that in 2010 and
2011 alone, the Government spend Nu. 24.9 millions on pedagogy-related training
for some 2,554 teachers.
Moreover, the teacher education colleges provide opportunities for pre-service teacher to learn several child centered teaching methods such as: activity method, field learning, inquiry method, cooperative learning, role play and simulation. Most teachers would remember the micro-teaching we did at the colleges to practice these techniques. Therefore, it is clear that teachers have the knowledge and skills to apply constructivist teaching techniques.
Despite these efforts, studies continue to show that teacher-centered teaching is still the most widely used method, indicating stagnation or a slow progress. Now the question is: Why is there a visible stagnation? Or why has there been a slow progress? I attribute it to five constraining factors la. However, the reasons that I am going to be sharing are not founded on any research, they are based on my experience and observations and I stand corrected if they are inappropriate la.
2.1 Lack of teacher generated pedagogical knowledge
The first reason I would like to propose is that there is a lack of teacher-generated pedagogical knowledge to inform their practices in Bhutan la. There is an absence of teacher voices on issues related to their teaching practices from a truly emic perspective and the teaching profession suffers, from “a shaky theoretical ground.’ This has resulted in three consequences:
1. Firstly,
teachers rely on out-of-school professionals in higher authorities or foreign
experts to inquire into their teaching practices. Teachers are knowledge
consumers and not knowledge generators and the knowledge generated by outsiders
may not be all the time relevant to address the context specific issues they
face in the classroom.
2. Secondly,
teachers rely on out of-school PD activities such as workshops and trainings to
gain knowledge related to their teaching. Again, knowledge obtained through
such means may not be relevant to the contextual realities of their classroom
teaching.
3. Thirdly,
the everyday classroom decisions that teachers make are based on their
intuitions, assumptions, hearsay, verbal advice, and latest fads which do not
guarantee success.
Therefore, there is a need for teachers to inquire into
their practices to generate knowledge on what works and what do not work in
their classrooms. Teachers need to explore whether the foreign
constructivist teaching models works in their classrooms or not, instead of
just accepting it. And find solid reasons for why these approaches work or do
not work. And think of what adjustments are required to make the foreign model
relevant.
One of the ways to do this is by empowering teachers to
carry out action research or conventional teacher research which is a
self-reflective tool that allows teachers to systematically inquire into their
practices. It is encouraging to note that the MoE and the teacher education
colleges are promoting action research. However, I have observed that most
teachers are not confident to follow the process of action research. This could
partly be because we have a foreign model and there is a question of the
relevance of the model. A part of my current research concerns this area la and
I am hoping that the findings will have implications in assisting Bhutanese
teachers to carry out action research confidently.
However, my suggestion at this point is, for the school
leaders and the MoE to create and foster a sound research culture in schools
which I believe is lacking at the moment la. There is a need to strengthen
action research courses in the teacher education colleges. There is a need
for teacher to take the role as reflective practitioners and gear towards
transforming teaching into a research-based profession la.
In carrying out classroom research, teachers have a distinct advantage over out-of-school researchers. Their position as insiders who know their classroom culture and their students give them the upper hand in finding specific and relevant solutions to their pedagogical issues, over outsiders who would not be as much familiar with the classroom realities. The other advantage I see in Bhutan is that teachers make up a large proportion of the total civil servants, I guess, 34.9%. If most teachers engage in action research, a rich and diverse pedagogical knowledge base would be generated in a short period, thereby laying a solid theoretical foundation to underpin the teaching profession in Bhutan la.
I will give you an example of UK. In the 1970s, that’s some five decades ago, there was a movement called the “Teachers as Researchers” movement initiated by Professor Lawrence Stenhouse that called for teachers to research into their practices. This movement had a remarkable impact on raising teacher quality. Teachers were able to base their classroom decisions on data and evidence and raise their teaching quality. They could also play active roles in curriculum development.
2.2 Curriculum as a barrier
The second reason is an obvious one. The existing school
curriculum is inappropriate for teachers to apply their constructivist
pedagogical knowledge and skills. I have been listening to practically all
previous EDUTALKs and most speakers generally agreed that Bhutan’s school
curriculum is content-overloaded. And the other day, Sir Sancha Rai and madam
Ambika also described the school curriculum as bulky, thick, prescriptive,
rigid and centralized.
The thick curriculum hardly provides time and space for the
teachers to apply their constructivist pedagogical knowledge. It rather forces
them to use teacher-centered teaching to fulfil the mandate of completing the
syllabus.
Therefore, what is needed at the moment is a curriculum that is designed from constructivist point of view to match up with teachers’ constructivist pedagogical knowledge and a curriculum that provides time and space for teachers to use their constructivist pedagogical knowledge without any pressure of completion.
Last week, there was some news of the REC taking some steps towards this la. However, there are still questions around its flexibility or whether it was just a cutting-down exercise of the previous curriculum, questions around inadequate teacher consultation and information, but I will not dwell much on this la.
2.3 Cultural barriers
The third reason could be due to cultural barriers.
Child-centered teaching is mostly popular in Euro-American countries where the
culture is different from our culture in Bhutan. And it is a teaching approach
that has worked well when teachers create a learning environment of open,
critical and two-way interaction between teachers and students or between the
students.
This nature of child centered teaching approach contradicts
some of the cultural values that we uphold. In particular Driglam Namzha or the
Bhutanese code of etiquette which is an important part of our social lives.
Driglam Namzha has its roots in Kangyur Dulwa, Buddha’s teaching on monastic
discipline. We promote Driglam Namzha in our schools as a part of school
discipline along with other values such as Tha-Damtshi and Ley Judrey. As
a result, we foster a classroom culture where there is respect for teachers,
where students are reticent to talk with teachers and ask questions, where
there is a high power distance and where teachers prefer student to quietly
listen to them. As Michael Rutland pointed out in an earlier EDUTALK, teachers
in Bhutan often tell students to “keep quiet” or “maintain order”. These
cultural elements contradicts the principles of constructivist teaching such as
open and active classroom interaction and students taking control of their
learning,
That is why it would have been hard for teachers to make the
transition to the new pedagogical approach because it needs letting go off of
our cultural values and embracing different kind of mindset and roles. And
not only teachers la, it also needs students to make a radical shift in their
roles and mindset from being passive to active.
My proposition to address this issue is for the teachers, to
make a conscious effort to embrace a new set of Driglam Namzha values. We
should know that Driglam Namzha is not limited to the etiquette of respecting
seniors. It also concerns the etiquette of following the principles of
Tha-dam-tshig, Ley-judrey, Jamba and Nyingjey. At the moment the predominant
and lopsided value that plays out in the class is respect for teachers, which
is also important but I suggest the teachers also emphasize on other Driglam
Namzha values such as:
· Tha-dam-tshig
(which refers to a close or positive relationship between teachers and students
· Jamba or
Kindness
· Nying-Jey or
Compassion
· Jam-Chong or
Love and care
These values would enable teachers to create a warm and friendly classroom environment which is what is required for child-centered teaching. Along with this the teachers need to step out of their conventional role of being the dominant figure in the class to taking the role of a guide and supporter through carefully planned lessons and engage in active interaction with students.
2.4 Teacher pedagogical beliefs, conceptions and memory
The other possible reason could be teachers’ pedagogical
conception and memory. Human experience shapes their conceptions and memories
which in turn drives their actions.
Most of our teachers, including myself, have along
experience of being taught in a teacher-fronted teaching environment when we
were students, in schools and later in pre-service teacher education
colleges and our pedagogical conceptions are largely around
teacher-fronted teaching. It could be because of this deep rooted conception
that most teachers find it hard to drop the old habit.
When we ask students, their ambitions in the class, some of
them would say that they would want to be teachers. We think that teacher
preparation and teacher education occurs only at teacher education colleges but
I would say that it happens even at schools because there are students who want
to be teachers and they observe the way their teachers teach them in their
class. Then the question that teachers need to ask is: “Do we practice the
right pedagogy so that future teachers have the right pedagogical conceptions?”
At the moment most teacher practice teacher centred teaching and it is likely
that the future teachers will continue the practice because their pedagogical
conception might largely be around teacher-centred teaching. So, we need to
break the chain. We need to stop passing the bug on to future teachers.
My recommendation on this is for the teachers to unlearn some of the ineffective pedagogical approaches and to embark on learning, designing and practicing new, effective and relevant pedagogical approaches, so that our future teachers develop the right pedagogical conceptions for right pedagogical practices.
There are also other issues such as time constraints, class
size, student number, and heavy workload but for now I will keep it here la. And
I am happy to take any questions and suggestions. Thank you la..
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, I would like to draw your attention to the Bhutan Professional Standards for teachers (BPST), a document that has been launched to raise teachers' professional standards or in other words teacher quality. The Ministry of Education has specified seven standards for teachers to fulfil and I believe teachers will be assessed against these standards to determine their professional standard la. The third standard concerns demonstration and application of sound pedagogical and content knowledge to facilitate effective teaching and learning.
As mentioned earlier, the ground reality is that there
are certain challenges that hinders teachers from making pedagogical
progress. The curriculum needs revision, there is a need for creating
sound research cultures, and there is a need for providing time flexibility and
adequate resources in the school. I think it would be hard for teachers to
fulfil these standards because at the moment the conditions in the schools are
not right la. Because of these challenges, many teacher friends that talked to
say that the BPST is an additional pressure rather than support from the MOE
la. Most of them are worried about how to find the time to engage in innovative
pedagogical practices within their heavy workloads of covering the heavy
curriculum and carrying out co-curricular activities.
Therefore, I propose the MoE to take a closer look at
teachers' professional lives in the schools first, determine the
feasibility of the plan, create the enabling conditions and then introduce
the standards la. In fact, I believe that this is how it should be for any
education reform initiative la. I will make a simple analogy la.
If parking police want the public to strictly follow the
rule of having their cars parked properly in the parking lots, first they have
to work on making sure that there are enough parking spaces. If there are
limited parking spaces then the rule will just be too much pressure for the
public la. This is a simple example la.
In a nut shell, I believe that placing a flexible
curriculum, creating supportive condition in the school and fostering a culture
of teacher inquiry, would open up the opportunity for teachers to raise their
pedagogical practices which would raise teacher quality and then eventually
raise the quality of learning.
Thank you for listening la and thank you Sir Sonam for the opportunity la.
**********************************************************************************
PS: Here is the link to the video
https://www.facebook.com/volunteers.strength/videos/714250052579270/
0 comments:
Post a Comment